Thursday,
June 1, A.M. |
  |
8:30-5:00 Foyer
Registration (all day)
Patapsco Book Display (all day)
9:00-9:15 Ches
II PL01
Opening Remarks – JPS
President & Program Organizers
9:15-10:30 Ches II PL01
Plenary Session 1 – David
Lewis-Williams
The mind in the cave: Consciousness and
the origins of art
David Lewis-Williams (University of Witwatersrand)
The transition from the Middle to the
Upper Palaeolithic in Western Europe was the time when human
beings committed themselves, seemingly irrevocably, to making
pictures and, at the same time, to developing complex social
structures. Deep underground, by the light of flickering lamps,
they limned bison, horses, aurochs and other animals. This presentation
considers diverse evidence for why they made this commitment
and for why they first began to think that small lines on a flat
surface can stand for a huge, live, moving animal. The evidence
derives from the cave art itself, hunter-gatherer communities
around the world, and from recent neuropsychological studies
of altered states of consciousness. The naturally labyrinthine
caves were transformed into manifestations of a complex supernatural
realm and also into social templates that reflected the first
distinctions between people that went beyond brute strength,
age and sex.
10:45-12:00 Ches II SY01 Symposium
Session 1
Creativity, giftedness, and novelty: Frills
or fundamentals?
Organizer: Lynn S Liben (Pennsylvania State
University)
Discussant: Norman Freeman (University of Bristol)
Developmental
psychologists and educators alike often place creativity, giftedness,
and novelty on the periphery of their work. In the world of education,
for example, when budgets are lean, it is common to see cuts
made in art education, and to limit the funding of special education
for gifted children. In the world of developmental psychology,
theory and research commonly focus on what is normative, rather
than on what is exceptional. Indeed, Piagetian theory is a particularly
good example of an approach that is centered on universals of
development.
This symposium
reverses this tradition by asking how creativity, giftedness,
and novelty inform both developmental theory and educational
practice. In “Gifted Spatial Thinking
in Science and Art,” Lynn Liben will describe a program
of work linking developmental progressions in spatial concepts
to children’s
success on both scientific and artistic tasks, discuss spatially
gifted thinking, and suggest how this work may inform educational
programs. In “Art Not Just for Art’s Sake: Does Arts
Learning Transfer?” Ellen Winner will describe an ethnographic
study of intense visual arts classrooms, report observed cognitive
skills and working styles that are potentially generalizable,
and raise issues involved in facilitating and studying the transfer
of skills across domains. In “Universals Are Not Enough:
The Role of Novelty and Transformational Thinking in Ontogenetic
Development and in Developmental Theory,” David Henry Feldman
will address basic theoretical questions concerning the role
of novelty and transformational thinking in individuals and in
society, with a particular focus on how novelty contributes to
advancement of knowledge in the circle of the sciences.
The discussant,
Norman Freeman, will draw from his prior work on artistic development
and developmental theory to comment on integrative themes and
future directions.
Gifted spatial thinking in science and art
Lynn
S Liben (Penn State)
Art not just
for art’s sake: Does arts
learning transfer?
Ellen Winner (Boston College)
Lois Hetland (Massachusetts College of Art)
Shirley Veenema (Harvard Graduate School of Education)
Kim Sheridan (Harvard Graduate School of Education)
Patricia Palmer (Harvard Graduate School of Education)
Universals
are not enough: The role of novelty and transformational thinking
in ontogenetic development and in developmental theory
David Henry
Feldman (Tufts University)
10:45-12:00 Ches III PS01
Paper Session 1
Issues in cognitive development
Chair: Peter
Kahn (University of Washington)
Faraday and Piaget: Experimenting
in Relation with the World
Elizabeth Cavicchi (MIT)
The natural philosopher
Michael Faraday and the psychologist Jean Piaget experimented
directly with natural phenomena and children. While Faraday originated
evidence for spatial fields mediating force interactions, Piaget
studied children’s
cognitive development. This paper treats their experimental processes
in parallel, taking as examples Faraday’s 1831 investigations
of water patterns produced under vibration and Piaget’s
interactions with his infants as they sought something he hid.
I redid parts of Faraday’s vibrating fluid activities and
Piaget’s hiding games. Like theirs, my experiences showed
that incomplete observations and confusions accompanied—and
facilitated—experimental developments. While working with
things in their hands, these experimenters’ minds were
also engaged, inferring new, more coherent understandings of
the behaviors under study. Transitory ripples disclosed distinct
patterns; infants devised more productive search methods. From
the ripples, Faraday discerned an oscillatory condition that
informed his subsequent speculations about light. From the infant
search, Piaget identified experimenting as a child’s means
of developing self and world, later envisioning its infusion
into education. Taken together, these two stories demonstrate
that cognitive capacities emerge in the actual process of experimenting.
This finding eclipses the historical context in its implications
for education today. When learners pursue their own experiments,
their minds develop.
Innovation and Intuition in Science: Preliminary
suggestions from research on the interaction between personal
and disciplinary epistemologies
Jen Arner (Clark University)
Mainstream discourses
about science both within and without the discipline suggest
intuition plays little or no role in the formulation of scientific
theories or the daily practices of scientists. When intuition
is recognized – prototypically in the case
of revolutionary theories or discoveries – its role is
often limited to a “Eureka!”-moment which provides
a novel synthesis or solution to an old problem. In contrast
to that traditional conceptualization, this paper provides examples
from an empirical research project in which college science students
suggested three distinct uses of intuition in their scientific
practices. First, students did hold out the possibility of intuition
providing a novel solution, but with respect to daily practices,
not just great achievements. Second, students suggested intuition
serves as a heuristic pointer, providing a direction in which
to proceed, but leaving the scientist to “do the work” of
getting to the solution. Thirdly, students discussed intuition
as evidence in its own right in the lab. This paper explores
the uses that several students make of intuition in science,
and explores how these may result from an interaction between
the student’s personal epistemology and the scientific
disciplinary epistemology that they are learning in the lab and
classroom.
When familiarity breeds bad thinking: Belief-bias
with reasonable and unreasonable premises
Cécile Saelen
(Université du Québec à Montréal)
Hugues Lortie Forgues (Université du Québec à Montréal)
Jocelyn Bélanger (Université du Québec à Montréal)
Walter Schroyens (Université de Montréal)
Henry Markovits (Université du Québec à Montréal)
Many
studies have shown that inferential behavior is strongly affected
by access to real-life information about premises. However, it
is also true that both children and adults can often make logically
appropriate inferences that lead to empirically unbelievable
conclusions. One way of reconciling these is to suppose that
logical instructions allow inhibition of information about premises
that would otherwise be retrieved during reasoning. On the basis
of this idea, we hypothesized that it should be easier to endorse
an empirically false conclusion on the basis of clearly false
premises than on the basis of relatively believable premises.
An initial study presented adult reasoners with inferences using
either prototypically reasonable premises or completely false
premises. In both cases, the logical conclusion was empirically
false. Consistent with predictions, ratings of the likelihood
of the conclusion were higher for completely false premises.
These results illustrate the complex relationship between real-world
knowledge and logical reasoning.
How can teachers enable students
to pose and solve problems using context within and outside mathematics?
Judit
Kerekes (City University of New York)
Maryann Diglio (City University of New York)
Case study shows
Piaget finding that if young children learn using manipulatives,
play, and integrated curriculum student recognize relationships
more easily. (Caweleti, Gordon, 2003) The pedagogy that made
Maryann’s classroom fun for the
kids and engaged them in their learning was one that placed the
student at the center of the teaching/learning experience, and
understood that teachers could contribute best when they act
as facilitators and mentors rather than authoritative figures
disseminating authoritative content to be memorized and reproduced.
The resultant discovery, aha moment, learning moment, made mathematics
meaningful to the students. They constructed their new knowledge
by doing. They were able to use strategies and models developed
through the process as tools for solving new, emerging problems.
They were covering Pólya’s (1969) steps of problem
solving: understanding problems, devising a plan, carrying out
the plan, and looking back or reflecting on problems, and they
did so effortlessly and effectively. Maryann succeeded with play
where so many before her failed with hard work.
Imagining the
im/possible in autism
Ljiljana Vuletic (University of Toronto)
Michel Ferrari (University of Toronto)
Autistic individuals are
said to have an impaired imagination. In this paper, we review
biographical and autobiographical literature, poetry, fiction,
and visual art by autistic individuals and show evidence
of the opposite. We demonstrate that the world of autistic children
and adults (at least of those who are high functioning) is
filled with imaginary beings, objects, places, times, and
situations. Therefore, we argue that imagination in autistic
individuals is not necessarily impaired. We also argue that this
mistaken characterization of autistic individuals has important
implications for interventions. We emphasize the importance of
studying autistic individuals and their abilities in natural
settings and contexts. We suggest that broader indicators of
imagination need to be considered when considering imaginative
capabilities of autistic individuals. Finally, we argue for the
therapeutic use of imaginative abilities of autistic individuals.
10:45-12:00 Loch I SY02
Symposium Session 2
Varieties of relational narrative:
Differing identities in differing relational practices
Organizer:
Luke Moissinac (Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi)
Discussant: Colette Daiute (The Graduate Center CUNY)
It is
increasingly being acknowledged that the foundational ontology
of human existence is not one of individual abstraction but
one of relation (Fishbane, 2001; Gergen, 1996; Slife, 2004),
which takes the person as inextricably embedded in relationships
with others. Indeed, Piaget advocated a similar perspective
when he claimed that “...there are
neither individuals as such nor society as such. There are just
interindividual relations” (Piaget,
1977, p.210). Such a view accords well with empirical research
on early infant intersubjectivity (see Trevarthen & Aitken,
2001 for a review) that locates the impetus for development in
the interactive relationships between infants and their principal
caregivers. From such relational beginnings, development is continuously
situated in relational contexts. Such relational contextuality
is even more important for identity development since the ‘other’ has
been taken as intrinsic to the formation of a self-concept since
Mead’s (1934) seminal formulation.
This
symposium uses relational narratives to explore developing
identities in differing types of relationships. In doing so,
it weds a relational ontology of being with a discursive-narrative
epistemology of discovery. Discourse in general, and narrative
in particular, is taken to be the medium par excellence for
constructing identities in interaction within communities of
practice (Wenger, 1998). The narratives of interest here are
not those that present a life-story in full, nor ones that
explicate an entire indelible life event. Instead, they are “small” stories that
pervade all social intercourse, be that everyday conversation,
discussions of varying formality, or interviews. The utility
of analyzing such small stories as indexes of identity projects
has already been demonstrated previously (e.g., Moissinac & Bamberg,
2005) but the new undertaking here is to explicitly examine how
they contribute to the management of identities in a range of
developing relationships.
Four
communities of practice will be represented in this symposium.
First, Bamberg will depict how pre-adolescent boys construct
stories of their relations with girls in informal discussions.
Next, Korobov and Thorne will present aspects of how emerging
adults employ nonchalance as a resource in relating relationship
problems. Thirdly, Moissinac’s
paper interrogates the relationship stories of queer men to display
the intersection of queer sexual identity with facets of dominant
masculinity. Finally, Medved and Brockmeier demonstrate how identity
issues are co-constructed in doctor-patient conversations.
In
these papers, we aim to both uncover the intrinsically relational
nature of developing identities as well as to evince the efficacy
of a discursive-narrative approach in identity development research.
The
discursive management of ‘hetero-attraction’ with
pre-adolescent male peers
Michael Bamberg (Clark University)
Nonchalance
as a narrative resource in emerging adults’ stories
about romantic relationship problems
Neill Korobov (University
of California, Santa Cruz)
Avril Thorne (University of California, Santa Cruz)
Paradoxes
of male queer identity development: Juxtapositions with dominant
masculinity
Luke Moissinac
(Texas A&M University-Corpus
Christi)
Andrew Smiler (State University of New York, Oswego)
Assessing
or interpreting the brain: Conversation between health professionals
and neurologically-impaired patients
Maria I Medved (University
of Manitoba)
Jens Brockmeier (University of Manitoba)
10:45-12:00 Loch II PS02 Paper
Session 2
Music development and arts education
Chair:
Yeh Hsueh (University of Memphis)
Discussant: Carolyn Hildebrandt (University of Northern Iowa)
Ontogenetic
roots of music and language: Play and imitation – a
structure-genetic and constructivistic view on vocal development
Stefanie
Stadler Elmer (University of Zurich)
Musical behaviour
such as vocalising, singing, listening and moving are already
present in early life. At the beginning they are universal
and sensorimotor. How do infants and children grow into their
oral culture, singing and speaking? Among previous developmental
theories we find the idea that musical behaviour follows an
invariable and age-related sequence of mastering more and more
intervals or `contour schemes’ of
the occidental music system. Often, we find a hidden ethnocentricity,
since, tacitly, occidental musical rules are considered to be
universal. Or, it is assumed that musical development is a matter
of biology and innate talent. Alternatively, a new theory is
presented and substantiated with empirical examples from case
studies. It is called ‘structure-genetic’ because
the structures of vocal activities, their genesis and their adaptation
to a culture are the focus of research. It is assumed that a
child’s
vocal development is a highly adaptive and constructive process
that starts as joyful vocal communication in infancy with caregivers.
Theoretical elements, principles and hypotheses about the development
are outlined. Emphasis is put on growing control and awareness
of own actions and thoughts, and imitation and play. Microgenetic
analyses of structural changes illustrate children’s creative
and adaptive processes towards socio-cultural conventions.
Dalcroze,
the body, movement, and musicality
Jay A Seitz (City University
of New York)
What forms the basis of musical expressivity?
The Swiss composer and music educator, Emile Jaques-Dalcroze,
believed that bodily processes, rhythm, and physical motion were
the basis of musical expressivity and music pedagogy. We can
rephrase his emphasis on the synergy between bodily and musical
processes into a question: How does the body contribute to thought
and musical understanding, in particular? We review a large body
of research and theory on the bodily and brain basis of musical
expression and find ample support for his seminal views. It thus
appears that Dalcroze was onto something essential to musical
thought and expression.
Differentiations
and integrations. The novel knowledge in the child’s
musical composition
Leda
de A Maffioletti (Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul)
This
study investigates the formation of new knowledge in Child Musical
Composition, linking advancements in the field to the process
of reflecting abstraction. The work is theoretically based on
Jean Piaget’s Genetic Epistemology and employs
the clinical method as its research methodology. The analysis
of compositions follows the psychological fundaments of Michael
Imberty’s musical semantics. Empirical data include 76
musical compositions by 70 subjects of 6 to 12 years of age – all
students of a private school in the city of Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Data were collected during one school semester and registered
as videoclips. The study includes explorations, constructions
and re-constructions of musical ideas as a “real-time composition”.
Results demonstrate that the development of compositions is characterized
by gradual construction of a whole view. Such view is allowed
by the formation of interdependence and connections that change
the ways to produce knowledge, thus allowing new articulations
within the composition’s macrostructure. The development
of musical composition implies forms of learning that underpin
symbolic exchanges in music.
The arts in
support of children’s
development: Changing meanings with changing theories
Kathleen
A Camara (Tufts University)
W George Scarlett (Tufts University)
Anne S Perkins (Maryland Institute College of Art)
Masami Stampf (Conservatory Lab Charter School)
The notion that
the arts can provide a powerful support for children’s
development is not new. What is new are the meanings giving to
this notion. During the hey-day of progressive education, the
notion meant instilling in children a creative spirit. During
the cognitive, Piagetian revolution in the late 1950’s,
it meant providing arts programs in parallel to and subordinate
to academics, the core curriculum, and a focus on logic and reasoning.
This paper explores more positive and powerful meanings that
derive from theories of multiple intelligences and from developmental
systems theories. In this paper, we demonstrate the power of
these newer ways of thinking about the arts and children’s
development and for promoting reform in schools – both
by citing the literature and by presenting case materials from
research conducted in schools in U.S., Ireland and England.
Thursday, June 1, P.M. |
  |
1:30-2:45 Ches II PL02 Plenary
Session 2 – Murray
Forman
Hip-hop culture, youth creativity, and the generational
crossroads
Murray Forman (Northeastern University)
Hip-hop and
its composite forms (encompassing rapping, DJing, graffiti, and
b-boying) have evolved into a global cultural phenomenon and a
multi-billion dollar industry over a thirty-year existence. Generally
associated with creative youth expression, hip-hop has long been
a force in joyful leisure practices but it has also subsequently
emerged as a lingua franca in the expression of racial identity,
spatial politics, and cultural values. Young people around the
world have mobilized hip-hop aesthetics and sensibilities to amplify
the crises of class and racial antagonism while articulating defiance
against informal discriminatory practices and organized systems
of state repression.
The
creative characteristics associated with early hip-hop include
genius innovation in the face of adversity and an innate capacity
among primarily black and Latino urban youth to radically subvert
familiar technologies, transforming them into tools of artistic
production. Through hip-hop, the detritus of American popular
culture has been re-inscribed and reassigned in the realm of
cultural meaning. In the process, hip-hop’s
most creative minds have actively embarked on a mission to revise
dominant narratives about contemporary urban existence, even as
they have altered the sonic and visual environment through which
we all circulate.
A
dilemma emerges, however, as hip-hop enters its fourth decade
and the notion of hip-hop “youth” begins
to unravel. Hip-hop is no longer solely the purview of a young
minority contingent but is, increasingly, an important element
in the lives of a diverse and aging population. The result of this
change is that, not only is there a generational rift between hip-hop
youth and adults associated with the Civil Rights era, but there
is also now a persistent and undeniable dissonance that is evident
between youth and their hip-hop-identified parents. Such developments
have implications for the scholarly study of hip-hop but also for
the ways in which hip-hop is situated within the traditional political
party system and other conventional social settings.
In
this presentation, these and other related factors will be taken
up and analyzed within a series of questions, including: What
are the dominant identities that are conveyed in and through
hip-hop today?; What are the stakes of adopting hip-hop’s expressive
forms under current conditions?; How has the influence of global
corporate power and the commercial culture industries affected
the creative character of contemporary hip-hop?; What, if any,
are hip-hop’s political possibilities?; How does a growing
generational dissonance within hip-hop culture impact its discourses
and practices? What does it mean to embark on something called “hip-hop
studies?”
3:00-4:30 Ches II IS01 Invited
Symposium 1
Art,
self & culture
Starting
from the premise that art constitutes a production of meaning,
participants in this invited symposium explore fundamental questions
regarding the relationship between collective culture and personal
identity, convention and creativity, form and content. Brent
Wilson examines the functions and aesthetic properties of adult-child
and child-child collaborative visual productions. Blake Lloyd
explores the functions of music videos in the cognitive and identity
development of adolescents. Joe Becker uses the idea of “form”—in
artistic activity and in Piaget’s constructivism—to
brige our understanding of knowledge and consciousness.
Chair/Discussant:
Peter Pufall (Smith College)
Children’s and adults’ collaborative
images: Issues of power and pedagogy
Brent Wilson (Penn State)
A
principal tenant of modernism was that each individual artist,
working in isolation, was obliged to create an endless succession
of innovative artworks that departed radically from previous
productions. Artists, educators, psychologists, and art historians
believed that children were artists whose artistic creativity
must be protected from adult and societal contamination. In our
postmodern time, however, notions of originality, creativity,
and even “contamination” have
changed. Artists willingly collaborate and unabashedly appropriate
previous styles and artworks. Every text and artwork is an assumed
amalgam—a hypertext, a collection, a recombination, an extension
of previous works. Now some who study children’s visual culture
are reassessing its character. Paradigmatic examples of modernist
children’s art, we realize, were produced by adults as much
as by children. Art teachers not infrequently directed—even
coerced—children to produce artifacts that had the expressive
look of “child art.” Now it seems reasonable to ask, “is
there actually such a thing as child art?” and also to wonder “what
is the ‘real’ visual culture of childhood?” When
children make images free from teacher influence, they usually
work from comics, cartoons, and illustrations. Acting alone or
in groups, rather than being little nonconformists, kids modify
existing images to produce their own knock-off versions of popular
visual culture. Rather than trying to be original, kids struggle
to master the conventions of contemporary visual culture. At the
same time, in classrooms, students and teachers continue to co-produce
images—but to whom should we attribute these classroom artifacts,
to adults or children? Perhaps it is the rare setting in which
adults and kids collaboratively produce visual cultural artifacts
attributable primarily to young people. It is adult/student and
kid/kid image-based collaborations and their pedagogical character
that I wish to explore. I will present a taxonomy of visual cultural
collaborative possibilities and analyze their aesthetic character
and pedagogical consequences. There are: (1) collaborations in
which kids organize themselves to produce things such as comic
books; (2) play-like spontaneous collaborations in which kids draw
on a blackboard or wall; (3) graphic dialogues and conversations
in which kids together, or kids and adults, converse through images;
(4) there are game-like extended dialogues or serial collaborations
in which co-equals improvise as they respond to alternating sequences
of individually produced images; (5) there are school art collaborations
where kids alter the course of a teacher proposed project—and
this is only a small sampling of types. These collaborative visual
cultural productions are distinguishable from students’ mere
responses to teachers’ classroom assignments. An understanding
of children’s visual culture also requires attention to variables
and issues such as power relationships, forms of contribution,
divisions of labor, types of control, matters of ownership and
attribution, instigation and redirection, originality and creativity,
process and product, function and purpose, and distinctions between
pedagogical, social, political, cultural, and aesthetic interests
and interpretations. To know the meaning of children’s images,
we must understand the conditions, ranging from collaborative to
coercive, under which they were made.
Creating the self: Music video,
socio-cognitive schema and positive developmental outcomes
Blake
Te’Neil Lloyd (Penn State Delaware County)
Music
videos can be defined as pictorial representations of life experiences,
conveyed in video images on television in a musical format. They
are products of the imaginations of the videos’ artists,
directors, and producers. Literature on media influence generally
devotes attention to the negative aspects associated with adolescent
exposure to this type of media. Most researchers have concluded
that adolescents 1) adopt the limited roles and often negative
identities depicted or 2) use these experiences for entertainment
(e.g., leisure) purposes only. In adopting either of these perspectives,
I propose that two important aspects of adolescent development
are minimized. First, they fail to adequately consider the newly
acquired formal operational capacities associated with this developmental
point in the life span – the capacity to reason, cognitively
explore possibilities, and make meaning of their environments.
Second, and equally important, they fail to allow consideration
of the process of “trying on” of identities – a
salient task of identity formation. The adolescent identity, media,
and socio-cognitive schema (AIMSS) framework seeks to explain how
adolescents cognitively process mass media images to create, enhance,
and reinforce positive concepts of self. Data will be presented
to support this theoretical position.
Understanding form: Artistic activity, Piagetian theory, and the nature of phenomenal experience
Joe Becker (University of Illinois at Chicago)
Drawing
more on our conceptions of science than those of art, focused
on knowledge rather than meaning, Piagetian discourse has come
to emphasize objective truth disconnected from subjective experience.
It is in danger, at least, of becoming complicit with the way
conceptions of knowledge are split off from a concern with phenomenal
experience in much of the current scientific study of cognition.
Art stands as antithesis to this split. Through the similarity
in the idea of form in artistic activity and in Piaget’s account of the
construction of knowledge, art offers support to constructivist
theory where the latter has drawn least attention and been least
developed-conceptualizing the intimate connection between knowledge
and consciousness. Foregrounding suggestions from Piagetian theory
concerning the nature of phenomenal experience, this paper conceives
consciousness in terms of form and form-content relations. This
approach emphasizes the way in which pre-existing cognitive forms
and newly emergent forms relate to one another providing a chain
from the most abstract thought to the most basic level of phenomenal
experience. This approach implies that we would do well to pursue
Piaget’s understanding of the role of form in acts of knowing
to the point where form is accepted into the ontology of science
in such a way as to provide a basis for a non-reductionist scientific
account of subjective experience.
3:00-4:30 Ches III SY03 Symposium
Session 3
Developmental and clinical perspectives on imaginary
companions
Organizer: Marjorie Taylor
(University of Oregon)
Discussant: Michele Root-Bernstein (Michigan
State University)
The
creation of an imaginary companion, either an invisible entity
or a special toy that becomes a regular part of the child’s
social world, is common in young children (40-60% have imaginary
companions), but is not well understood. In some studies, having
an imaginary companion has been associated with positive characteristics,
whereas other studies report no differences or negative characteristics
for children with imaginary companions (for a review see Taylor,
1999). The goal of this symposium is to present recent research
investigating the social and cognitive correlates of having an
imaginary companion from the perspectives of both developmental
and clinical psychology. In addition to investigating the relations
between having an imaginary companion (or a particular type of
imaginary companion) and creativity, sociability, inhibitory control,
behavior problems, and dissociation, the presenters will provide
new information about the best ways to identify children who have
imaginary companions and elicit information about them.
The first
presentation provides an overview of the phenomenon and reports
the results of research examining the relation between having an
imaginary companion and creative potential. Children with imaginary
companions scored higher on two measures of creativity than children
without them. In presentation 2 the relation between general sociability
and play with imaginary companions was investigated. Children with
invisible friends, but not children with personified objects were
shown to score higher on sociability than children without any
type of imaginary companion. In presentation 3, children who described
their imaginary companions as being relatively independent and
autonomous were rated as having significantly higher social skills
and significantly fewer internalizing and externalizing problem
behaviors than children without imaginary companions. In presentation
4, the characteristics of imaginary companions created by a nonclinical
sample of children and those created by traumatized children with
dissociative symptoms were examined. In comparison with the dissociative
children, the nonclinical children were more likely to report feeling
in control over these experiences, pleasure in the interactions,
awareness that they were pretend, and were less likely to be involved
in interacting with the imaginary companions when feeling anger.
The
results of these studies raise many questions about the form of
imaginary companions (invisible friends vs. personified objects),
the content of the fantasy (e.g., the extent that the child experiences
the imaginary companion as autonomous), and the diverse functions
this type of pretend play serves in the lives of children from
different environments.
Imaginary companions and creative potential
Eva Hoff
(Lund University)
Individual
differences in children’s sociability
and their play with imaginary companions
Alison B Shawber (University
of Oregon)
Marjorie Taylor (University of Oregon)
Inhibitory control and social
skills of children with imaginary companions
Stephanie M Carlson
(University of Washington)
A comparison of imaginary companions
in normal and maltreated children
Joyanna Silberg (Sheppard Pratt
Health System)
3:00-4:30 Loch I PS03 Paper
Session 3
Language and
communication
Chair: Michael Bamberg (Clark University)
A mental
image is worth a thousand verbs: Imageability predicts verb learning
Weiyi Ma (University of Delaware)
Colleen McDonough (Neumann College)
Robert Lannon (Temple University)
Roberta Golinkoff (University of Delaware)
Kathy Hirsh-Pasek (Temple University)
Twila Tardif (University of Michigan)
Why
are verbs much harder to learn than nouns in English and in many
other languages, but relatively easy to learn in Chinese? The
answer might lay in imageability, or the capability of a word
to arouse a mental image. Research suggests that words with higher
imageability are learned earlier than words with lower imageability,
regardless of their grammatical class. Therefore, we hypothesize
that the universal noun-advantage in early vocabulary is due
to the high imageability of nouns relative to verbs. Similarly,
the relative verb-advantage in early Chinese vocabulary is due
to the fact that Chinese verbs tend to be highly imageable. The
current study reveals two significant results. First, imageability
ratings are a reliable predictor of age of acquisition across
languages when we used an established vocabulary instrument (the
CDI) as opposed to adult recollections about when they learned
a word. Second, Chinese children’s verbs received higher
imageability ratings than English children’s verbs while
Chinese and English children’s nouns did not differ in imageability
ratings. It appears that high imageability boosts verb learning
by simplifying the process of action segmentation and relation
abstraction.
Does the owl fly out of the tree or leave the tree
flying?: The development and plasticity of lexicalization biases
Christina
Infiesta (University of Delaware)
Rachel Pulverman (University of Michigan)
Each language has its
own conflation patterns that govern the way words, especially verbs,
are used. Previous research has shown that speakers of each language
form lexicalization biases due to repeated exposure and use of
their language. However, it appears as though adults, with sufficient
exposure to a second language, can adopt the new patterns of that
language regardless of the biases of the first language. This study
asks when and how English learners of Spanish are able to adopt
the motion expression patterns of their second language and use
them in language production. In addition, a direct comparison is
made with the oral productions of native Spanish children (mean
age = 3;9). A comparison is also made between these two groups
and native older Spanish speaking children (mean age = 12;2) in
order to see how close each group comes to using the patterns of
developed native language. Preliminary results show that, for learners
of Spanish, increased exposure and experience with the language
increases the number of path expressions produced. Additionally,
by three years of age, children, like the advanced Spanish learners,
already have almost complete mastery of the lexical patterns of
their language.
This
experiment is killing me! Children’s
comprehension of verb metaphor
Jaclyn Pilette (University of Delaware)
Julia Campbell (University of Delaware)
Roberta M Golinkoff (University of Delaware)
Amanda Brandone (University of Michigan)
Rebecca Seston (University of Delaware)
Metaphor
holds an important place in human language. We are constantly
and unconsciously employing metaphors to assist us in expressing
our intentions. Children need to understand verbal metaphors
in order to participate in conversations (especially with adults)
and to understand text. This study is among the first of its
kind to examine how children explain novel verbal metaphors.
We hypothesized that skill in verbal metaphor would increase
with age and that subjects would find psychological verbal metaphors
more difficult to explain than physical verbal metaphors. English-speaking
6-, 8-, and 10-year-olds as well as college students were the
participants. Subjects were read 24 short stories that ended
in a metaphor. Eight of these were verbal metaphors. The stories
were comprised of one or two sentences that preceded the metaphor
in order to provide context. Preliminary results support our
hypotheses. First, metaphor comprehension increased with age
and second, psychological metaphors were uniformly more difficult
to interpret than physical metaphors across all age groups. The
finding that verbal metaphor comprehension shows a developmental
trend is a significant and new result. Metaphors infuse much of
our everyday language (Lakoff & Johnson, 1980),
yet detecting and appreciating the relations implied in verbal
metaphors proves a difficult task.
“Zorbs cloom”:
The influence of generic language on verb-learning
Amanda C Brandone
(University of Michigan)
Thomas Deptula (University of Delaware)
Research
on generics (e.g., Birds fly) has focused on the role of generic
noun phrases in organizing categorical knowledge and guiding
inferences about members of a noun category (e.g., Birds). However,
research has neglected to investigate the influence of generics
on organizing predicate information accompanying generic noun
phrases (e.g., fly). The current experiment examined whether
generic phrases play a role in helping children realize that
verbs, like nouns, can apply to more than a single instance of
a category. In a book reading task, 2- and 2 1⁄2-year-olds
were introduced to a novel verb using either generic or nongeneric language.
Children were tested on their ability to map and extend the novel verb. Results
revealed an interaction between age group and language type: Whereas 2-year-olds
performed equally in the generic and nongeneric language conditions, 2 1⁄2-year-olds
performed significantly better in the nongeneric condition. Findings suggest
that generics may not be used as a general didactic tool; rather, generics may
convey information and guide inferences specifically about noun categories. For
children sensitive to the linguistic distinction between and categorical implications
of generic versus nongeneric noun phrases, generics may in fact interfere with
the task of verb learning.
Vacuuming
with my mouth? Children’s ability
to extend verbs
Rebecca Seston (University of Delaware)
Jaclyn Pilette (University of Delaware)
Julia Campbell (University of Delaware)
Nicole Tomlinson (University of Delaware)
Kathy Hirsh-Pasek (Temple University)
Children have a difficult
time learning verbs and once they learn them, they are reluctant
to extend them to new situations. The present study asked if 6-
and 10-year-olds are able to extend common verbs to novel situations.
Subjects were read eight unusual extensions of common verbs. Stimulus
verbs require an instrument to perform their function. Half of
the verbs use an obligatory instrument that shares the name of
the action it performs (e.g., to vacuum), while the other half
do not have specific instruments (e.g., to write). Two important
results emerged. First, there is a developmental trend such that
6-year-olds are less likely than 10-year-olds to correctly extend the verbs.
Second, children found it more difficult to extend the verbs that do not include
a specific instrument than the verbs that do. These findings are significant
as they reveal how difficult verb extension is, even for older children. Knowing
how to extend familiar verbs - a true test of verb learning - is a more difficult
and delayed task than previously imagined.
The
effects of mothers’ regulatory
speech on children’s participation
in the task
Zilda Fidalgo (Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada)
We
examined the effects of mothers’ scaffolding discourse on
children’s
participation in problem solving tasks, involving fifty mother-child (3-5)
dyads. Mothers’ discourse was coded for the level of abbreviation
and referential perspective and children’s participation
as directly, indirectly and self-regulated. A negative correlation
between low levels of abbreviation, referential perspective and
children’s level of participation was found, but any significant
correlation between higher levels of abbreviation and referential
perspective and children’s
self-regulation While more regulatory categories of mothers’ speech
are clearly an obstacle to children’s autonomous participation, the
exposition to higher cognitive demands and conceptual expressions, is open
to discussion.
3:00-4:30 Loch II PS04 Paper
Session 4
Arts
education—drawing
Chair: Julia Penn Shaw
(SUNY Empire State College)
Discussant: Saba Ayman-Nolley (Northeastern Illinois University)
A
survey of children, teachers and parents on children’s drawing
experience at home and at school
Richard P Jolley (Staffordshire
University)
Esther Burkitt (Open University)
Sarah E Rose (Staffordshire University)
Although
much research has been carried out into the drawings children
produce few studies have asked children to comment upon their
experiences of drawing. Similarly, little is known about teachers’ and parents’ perspectives
on children’s drawing activities and how these shape children’s
drawing experience. This study aims to address this gap in the literature
by surveying children, their parents and their teachers to establish how
a wide range of factors (e.g., attitudes, art environment and cultural art
values) are influencing children’s
drawing behaviour and its development. Two hundred and seventy children aged
5 to 14 years participated in a semi-structured interview after being randomly
selected within nine age groups from over 25 schools. The principle art teacher
for each child was also interviewed and the child’s parents completed
the parent survey; all interviews and surveys included both open and closed
responses which were analysed quantitatively and qualitatively. This project
is still underway, but it is anticipated that the results of the study will
provide a comprehensive and systematic investigation into children’s
drawing behaviour at school and home. In particular, it is hoped that the
results will suggest why drawing activity declines around pre-adolescence
and what can be done to arrest this decline.
Of
tadpoles and belly buttons: The effect of suggestion on preschoolers’ person
drawings
Carol
A Coté (Rutgers,
The State University of New Jersey)
A
preschooler’s ‘tadpole’ person
drawing with its characteristic lack of a torso may exemplify the
attention limitations of these young children. If only those few
features which are most salient to the child are depicted, then
a torso may simply not be important. In this study 73 preschoolers
were asked to draw a person, then a person with a belly button.
This task should make the torso more salient and perhaps even necessary.
The tadpole drawers, however, did not change their figure type
to accommodate the new feature. Instead they very economically
included the belly button either inside the tadpole circle or just
below the circle. The children were also asked to place a belly
button on pre-drawn figures of a tadpole and a person with a torso.
Interestingly, many did not respond to the pre-drawn tadpole, believed
to have been drawn by another child, in the same way as their own
drawing. Discussion focuses on how these findings may reflect on
the meaning of the figure drawing for the child and how drawings
made by another child are viewed. The findings also illustrate
limits in attention and memory for features, and the consistent
midline orientation of the belly button feature.
A pedagogy of the
big questions of life: College students discover themselves as
meaning makers through art education that transforms and liberates
Kimberly
Sanborn (Northeastern Illinois University)
A
constructivist understanding of human development establishes
an important role for educators: to provide learning opportunities
that allow students to build confidence in and raise awareness
of themselves as meaning makers. This study examines college
student experience of a studio art class course that involves
exploration of their own lives, thoughts and feelings as they
confront life’s
big questions (Who am I? What does it mean to be human?) through artistic
activity. Twenty–five students enrolled in an introductory
ceramics course participated in this teacher research. Data from
student writings, taped interviews, and the art produced in the
course illustrates their achievement of liberation and transformation,
representing a confluence of the deepest purposes of education and art.
With this particular medium and student population, such achievement
depends on: three thoughtfully designed projects; encouraging student
introspection; and the classroom community that results from the
public nature of studio work and sustained peer interaction. Comfort
in community enables students’ openness and the courage
to confront the big questions of life through their art. In this way, they
develop their understanding of themselves and come to appreciate
their own lives as sources of meaning.
Artistic temperaments in
children? The quest for key indicators
David Pariser (Concordia
University)
Paul Hastings (Concordia University)
Anna Kindler (University of British Columbia)
Axel van den Berg (McGill University)
Modern
psychologists and Renaissance art historians have all speculated
about the mystery of the artistic temperament. In this talk,
we will consider whether there is linkage among the physiology,
temperament , and the artistic ability of young children (between
the ages of 2 and 9). Ninety seven children (52 boys, 45 girls)
generated five drawings each: Children’s physiological
responses were recorded before and during drawing activity. Children’s
temperaments were established based on a standardized parental questionnaire.
The children’s
drawings were evaluated by 10 art-trained adult judges. A “temperamental” factor,
namely being Withdrawn, seems a better predictor for girls aesthetic endeavors
than for boys. Is it possible that an “artistic temperament” exists,
and that it is more likely to be found among women than men? Demonstrating
the existence of such a temperament among women would shed more critical
light on the under-representation of women in the artistic Pantheon. Conversely,
might there be gender-specific profiles that suggest the shy, reclusive
girl and the calm, outgoing boy are most likely to produce work that is
creative and aesthetically pleasing ? Such findings would fly in the face
of the Romantic stereotype of the transgressive and turbulent (male) artist
as the likely originator of significant art.
Temperament and aesthetics
Jessica E Kieras (University
of Oregon)
Michael I Posner (University of Oregon)
Mary K Rothbart (University of Oregon)
Although aesthetic activities appear to
be a part of all human cultures, there are individuals differences in the extent
to which people are interested in art-related activities. If these individual
differences are related to temperament (relatively stable, early appearing
individual differences), than it may be possible to identify children
who might benefit most from participation in the arts at an early
age. The current study investigated temperament factors as predictors
of individual differences in aesthetic interest in college students,
who completed a self-report questionnaire. The Adult Temperament
Questionnaire (ATQ) was used to assess four temperament factors: Positive Affect,
Negative Affect, Effortful Control and Orienting Sensitivity. Aesthetic interest
was assessed by adding items that assessed interest in music, visual arts,
theater, and ceramics. A multiple regression using subscales of
the temperament factors predicted 39% of the variance in aesthetic
interest. Results will be discussed in terms of how participation
in art-related activities might be especially beneficial for children
with certain temperamental qualities.
4:45-5:45 Ches I PT01 Poster
Session 1
Poster Session 1: Cognitive / Social
Posters will be available for viewing all
day. Authors will be present from 4:45-5:45
1. Clarifying the
relation between bullying and social cognition
Laura Failows (Simon
Fraser University)
2.
The impact of audience type on the communication of emotional
information in children’s
drawings
Esther Burkitt (The
Open University, UK)
3.
Do the ends justify the means? Variations in sibling teachers’ responses
to learner errors
Holly E Recchia (Concordia
University)
Nina Howe (Concordia University)
Stephanie Alexander (Concordia University)
4.
Shake your rattle down to the ground: Infants’ exploration
of objects relative to surface
James D Morgante (University
of Massachusetts - Amherst)
Rachel Keen (University of Massachusetts - Amherst)
5.
Does it matter that nature’s “real”? A plasma window’s
effects on looking behavior and heart rate recovery from low
level stress
Peter Kahn (University
of Washington)
Nathan G Freier (University of Washington)
Rachel L Severson (University of Washington)
Jennifer Hagman (University of Washington)
Brian Gill (Seattle Pacific University)
Batya Friedman (University of Washington)
Erika N Feldman (University of Washington)
Sybil Carrere (University of Washington)
Anna Stolyar (University of Washington)
6. The role
of input in children’s acquisition of mental state verbs and
a theory of mind
Alice Ann Howard (University
of Connecticut)
Letitia Naigles (University of Connecticut)
Lara Mayeux (University of Oklahoma)
7.
Children’s
evaluations of parental roles in the home and the workforce
Stefanie
Sinno (University of Maryland)
Melanie Killen (University of Maryland)
8. An investigation
of sex differences in emotion based decision making
Warren D
Anderson (Temple University)
Anthony Steven Dick (Temple University)
Willis F Overton (Temple University)
9. The developmental
relations between theory of mind and gender-typed development
in preschoolers
Michael R Miller (University
of Victoria)
10.
Patterns of children’s
social thought and quality of attachment relationships
Manuela
Veríssimo (UIPCDE, ISPA)
António J Santos (UIPCDE, ISPA)
Ligia Monteiro (UIPCDE, ISPA)
11. Developmental
vulnerability to irrational gambling judgments: A dual process
account
Eric Amsel (Weber
State University)
Paul Klaczynski (National Science Foundation)
12.
Assessing children’s
drawing ability
Marc H Bornstein (National
Institute of Child Health and Human Development)
Martha E Arterberry (Gettysburg College)
Darlene A Kertes (National Institutes of Health)
Joan Suwalsky (National Institute of Child Health and Human Development)
Paola Venuti (Università di Trento)
13.
A comparison of preschoolers’ explanations
of their own actions in two different representational contexts
Cristina M Atance
(University of Ottawa)
Jennifer L Metcalf (University of Ottawa)
14. Creative representations
in science learning: Examining variations of categorization in
a concept sorting task
Hiroshi Maeda (Saitama
Prefectural University)
15. Are photographs
snapshots or works of art?
Deborah R Siegel (University
of California, Santa Cruz)
Lisa E Szechter (Tulane University)
16. Hip hop and popular
music as vehicles for psychological development and social change
Kim Passamonte (North
Carolina Central University)
Glenn Foster (North Carolina Central University)
Cinawendela Nahimana (Gwamaziima Charter School)
Jonathan Livingston (North Carolina Central University)
17.
Cultural variations in children’s drawings of the elderly
Saba Ayman-Nolley
(Northeastern Illinois University)
Sonya Delgado (Northeastern Illinois University)
Lisa Krause (Northeastern Illinois University)
Jennifer Baker (Northeastern Illinois University)
18. Motivational orientations
and their relations to identity status in adolescence
Theo Elfers (Simon
Fraser University)
Tobias Krettenauer (Humboldt University at Berlin)
19. The aesthetic
value of thinness in preadolescents from two different cultural
backgrounds
Irene Solbes (Universidad Complutense de Madrid)
Ileana Enesco (Universidad Complutense de Madrid)
Carolina Callejas (Universidad Autónoma de Madrid)
20.
Assessment of children’s
personality development through narrative methods
Giselle B Esquivel (Fordham University)
Kimberly Banks (Fordham University)
Staci Bloom (Fordham University)
6:00-7:00 Ches II ART Artists’ Panel
Artists’ Panel:
Creative processes across the arts
Moderator: Constance
Milbrath
Artists: Elizabeth Arnold (University of Maryland)
Maren Hassinger (Maryland Institute College of Art)
Gerald Levinson (Swarthmore College)
Three highly regarded artists from the fields
of literary, visual, and musical arts will comment on their artistic development
from their first identification as an artist, on the sources of inspiration
for their artistic ideas, and on the creative process that they
follow in bringing an idea into fruition.
Elizabeth
Arnold teaches poetry at the University of Maryland. Her first book of poems,
The Reef, was nominated for the Boston Book Review’s
Bingham Poetry Prize in 2000. In 2002 she won a Whiting Writers
Award, conferred by the Mrs. Giles Whiting Foundation in New York.
The awards are given annually to only ten emerging writers in fiction,
nonfiction, poetry and plays. She has received a Lannan Foundation-sponsored
fellowship from the Fine Arts Work Center, a Yaddo fellowship,
a Bread Loaf scholarship, a Friends of Writers tuition grant, and,
most recently, a Bunting fellowship from the Radcliffe Institute for Advanced
Study at Harvard. Her poems and essays have appeared in Slate, TriQuarterly,
Chicago Review, Poetry Daily, Kalliope, Sagetrieb, and Caroline Quarterly.
She edited and wrote the afterword for the first edition of Mina
Loy’s novel, Insel, which was published by Black Sparrow Press in 1991. Arnold has taught
at the University of Chicago and Warren Wilson College and recently joined
the faculty of the Creative Writing Program at the University of
Maryland.
Maren
Hassinger is Graduate Director at the Maryland Institute College
of Art and has been Director of the Rinehart School of Sculpture
at Maryland Institute College of Art, one of the oldest programs
of its type in America. A graduate of Bennington and UCLA, she
has mounted many solo exhibitions and participated in more than
120 group shows. Her work is included in more than 34 catalogs
and in the public collections of AT&T, the Pittsburgh Airport as well as
in outdoor areas such as Grant Park, Chicago. The “Anonymous Was A Woman” and
International Association of Art Critics awards recipient has performed at
the Museum of Modern Art, been reviewed extensively in Art in America, The
New York Times, Sculpture Magazine, the Baltimore Sun, and ART news among others.
She has received grants from the Gottlieb Foundation, Joan Mitchell Foundation,
and the National Endowment for the Arts and been artist in residence at ASAP,
the Nature Conservancy/Andy Warhol Estate, the Printmaking Workshop and Studio
Museum in Harlem. The Rinehart School of Sculpture is at the center of innovation
in this evolving medium, where students work in a wide range of mediums and
approaches – from
stone-carving and metals casting to installations and time-based art such as
video and performance.
Gerald Levinson is the Jane Lang Professor of Music
at Swarthmore College. He has been increasingly recognized as one
of the major composers of his generation. His teachers included
George Crumb, Richard Wernick, and George Rochberg at the University
of Pennsylvania; Ralph Shapey at the University of Chicago; and
French composer Olivier Messiaen at the Paris Conservatory. Levinson
has received many awards for his music, including the Goddard Lieberson Fellowship
and the Music Award (for lifetime achievement) from the American Academy of
Arts and Letters, two N.E.A. Fellowships, and the Prix International
Arthur Honegger de Composition Musicale. He spent two years in
Bali as a Henry Luce Foundation Scholar and as a Guggenheim Fellow.
His works have been widely performed in the US and Europe, by such
orchestras as the Philadelphia Orchestra and the Los Angeles Philharmonic.
Recordings are available on CRI, Laurel, Albany, and CRS labels.
His newest work, Toward Light, for organ and orchestra, was recently premiered
by the Philadelphia Orchestra to inaugurate the new organ in its concert hall.
7:00-8:00 Gallery REC1
President’s Reception
President’s
Reception (sponsored by Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers)
Friday,
June 2, A.M. |
  |
9:00-10:30 Ches II IS02 Invited
Session 2
Why arts education? Research
evidence about processes and outcomes
Chair/Discussant: K Ann Renninger
The
RAND report, Gifts of the Muse, calls for developing an analytical
framework that explains the benefits of arts education and goes
beyond simply saying that arts education is distinctive (McCarthy,
Ondaatje, Zakaras, & Brooks, 2004). Research on arts education
and arts programs have begun to describe their potential for supporting
problem solving and learning, or learning how to learn, as well
as “the habits of mind, competencies, and personal dispositions
inherent to arts learning” (Deasey, 2000, p. 1-2). Current
issues in this research concern identification of relevant indicators
for study, the nature and scope of participation, and to what “arts” is
understood to refer (exposure and/or talent development).
This
interactive symposium is designed to engage its participants in
thinking seriously about the impact of arts education. It will
focus on findings from current research projects in order to consider
answers to three questions:
a. What are the salient characteristics
of arts education as an environment for learning- in and/or out
of school?
b.
Who participates and how do they gain access? What impact do
the arts have on children’s
learning?
c. What is unique about the
arts as a context for learning?
The symposium will open with
presentations of answers based on research findings and will then
be opened for discussion of symposium questions by symposium participants
and the audience. K. Ann Renninger will chair and moderate this
session.
Hidden within arts: Problem-seeking
and solving
Shirley Brice Heath (Brown University)
Reported
here are two multi-year studies of intensive immersion of primary-level
children in creating arts-based learning environments for their
schools. (Note that both schools are located in England where the
government has a national policy of sponsorship for partnering
schools in rejuvenating areas with creative opportunities.) The
twist in the two programs—one centered on visual and language
arts and the other on dramatic arts--that sets them outside regular
arts lessons was the public role of the projects undertaken by
the children. As planners, managers, critics, and spokespersons
for both their arts and the environments needed for their creative
work, the children came to identify themselves as figures with
power and voice within the school culture and for the school within
the community. The children, living in severely economically depressed
and isolated geographic regions and often marked as “learning
disabled,” exhibited gains in attentional focus and cognitive,
linguistic, and mathematical achievement. The process of their
changes and their roles in shaping their learning environments
point to some previously unrecognized elements of educational entrepreneurship
channeled through the arts.
Ecologies of opportunity: The
arts in comprehensive high schools
Dennie Wolf (Brown University)
This
paper presents data from an in-depth study of the role that arts
activities play in the lives of students attending comprehensive
high schools. In particular, the data and discussion focus on the
ways in which the arts are often, though not categorically, “ecologies
of opportunity” providing access to learning expectations
and experiences that are rare for adolescents. These include the
expectation to produce, not just to consume, knowledge; to develop
a critical stance on the process of education, and to transfer
learning to spaces outside school. In addition, the paper raises
questions about the traditional ways of thinking about the outcomes
of arts education and traditional methods for capturing the effects
of sustained engagement in the arts.
“Don’t be shy,
sing, stand tall...stand tall means you can do it”:
Self-efficacy and learning in an out of school choral training program
Sara Posey
(Swarthmore College)
K Ann Renninger (Swarthmore College)
Findings
are reported from a cross-sectional mixed methods study of 7-18
year-old participants’ feelings
of self-efficacy and learning in a rigorous out-of-school choral
training program. The directors provide opportunities for participants
to develop an appreciation of music, the ability to read music, and a sense of
their own possibilities (in music, as part of a community, as learners). Consistent
with studies of (a) arts programs as supports for student learning, (b) powerful
learning environments, and (c) prodigious talent development, the choral training
program supports participants who would traditionally be considered “at-risk” to
sustain and deepen interest for a variety of music, learn music-related knowledge
and skills, and develop cognitively, socially and emotionally. Developmentally,
participants’ feelings of self-efficacy in working with rigorous musical
content appears to fluctuate due to their representational redescription of themselves
as participants and musicians.
9:00-10:30 Ches III SY04 Symposium
Session 4
Executive
functioning & emotion
regulation
Organizer: Dana Liebermann (University
of Victoria)
Discussant: Ulrich Müller (University of Victoria)
Increasingly,
attention is being given to the concept of emotional regulation
in developmental psychology. The study of emotion regulation, however,
is complicated by difficulties in differentiating an emotion from
the regulation of that emotion. What makes emotion regulation such
an attractive construct to study is its ability to account for
how and why emotions organize or facilitate other psychological
processes such as Executive Functioning (EF; Cole et al., 2004). Although emotional
control can be differentiated from EF, it is believed that emotional control
is influenced by and, in turn, influences the development of EF. The three presentations
in this symposium are examples of research that attempts to clarify how and why
EF and emotion regulation are related.
The regulation of attention and its relationship with emotion regulation is an
example of current interest in investigating linkages between EF and emotion
regulation. The executive attention network is seen to underlie temperamental
effortful control, the ability to suppress a dominant response in favor of a
subdominant response (Rothbart & Rueda, 2005). The first presentation will
present evidence supporting a link between the functioning of the executive attention
network and children’s regulation of the expression of emotion.
Researchers
have suggested that the cognitive changes allowing preschoolers to integrate
multiple perspectives are the same changes required for development of EF (Prencipe & Zelazo,
2005). The second presentation examines the role of perspective on preschoolers’ affective
decision making and demonstrates how developments in deliberate problem-solving
influence self-regulation.
The
third and final presentation of the symposium will describe a study that investigates
the relationships between EF, social cognition and emotion regulation in 3-,
4-, and 5-year-olds. By assessing these three constructs, their developmental
trajectories, their structural relationships and individual differences on
each construct can be examined.
These presentations unite research
examining both the cognitive and social interaction aspects of
emotion regulation, providing clarification regarding the relationship
between EF and the regulation of emotions.
Affective decision making for
self and other
Angela Prencipe (University
of Toronto)
Philip David Zelazo (University of Toronto)
Executive attention and the
regulation of affect displays
Jessica E Kieras (University
of Oregon)
Jennifer Simonds (University of Oregon)
M Rosario Rueda (University of Granada)
Mary K Rothbart (University of Oregon)
Executive
functioning, social cognition & emotion
regulation in preschoolers
Gerry
Giesbrecht (University of Victoria)
Dana Liebermann (University of Victoria)
9:00-10:30
Loch I PS05 Paper Session 5
Cross-cultural issues in social
relations
Chair: Susan Golbeck (Rutgers
University)
Discussant: Kristin Neff (University of Texas at Austin)
Rethinking
measures of Cultural Continuity within Indigenous communities:
Will what works on the coast work on the plains? (Kachimaa Mawiin “Maybe for
Sure”)
Christopher E Lalonde (University
of Victoria)
Michael J Chandler (University of British Columbia)
Brenda Elias (University of Manitoba)
Michael Hart (Assembly of Manitoba Chiefs)
Kathi Avery Kinew (Assembly of Manitoba Chiefs)
John O’Neil (University of Manitoba)
In
Canada, the suicide rate for Indigenous persons is 3-5 times
higher than that of the general population. For Indigenous youth,
the rates are 5-20 times higher. Our own efforts to understand
these grim statistics led us to examine the possibility that
suicide rates would be lower within Indigenous (First Nations)
communities that engage in specific cultural and political practices
that work to preserve and promote traditional knowledge and to
strengthen commitment to community. Thus far, our work in British
Columbia has identified a set of nine community practices that
are associated with substantial reductions in suicide risk. These
include measures of direct political control over community services
(e.g., policing, education, health, child protection), the preservation
of cultural activities (e.g., traditional language use, construction
of cultural facilities), and of success in securing self-determination (e.g.,
self-government, land claims and treaty negotiations). Though strongly predictive
of community-level suicide rates, these indexes of “cultural continuity” were
created with reference to the particular socio-historical context of the First
Nations of British Columbia. Whether or not these measures can be made to apply
to distinctly different Indigenous communities in other regions of Canada remains
an open question. The study to be presented describes the process of adapting
the model developed in British Columbia
to the Dene, Cree, Ojicree, Ojibway, and Dakota peoples of Manitoba.
First Nations
women: Supporting the health and cultural identity of youth
Robin
A Yates (University of Victoria)
Christopher E Lalonde (University of Victoria)
For
Canada’s Aboriginal peoples,
the effects of colonization continue to be measured in lowered health status
and increased death rates—and especially
in elevated rates of youth suicide. Among First Nations youth, suicide rates
appear to be influenced by community efforts to preserve and promote traditional
culture and to assert control over community life. This study concentrates on
one aspect of such efforts—the participation of First Nations women in
local government—and on the fact that suicide rates are lower in communities
where women occupy the majority of seats on the Band Council. In-depth interviews
were conducted with ten First Nations women with extensive experience in community
governance. The interviews were analyzed for themes regarding how and why these
women became involved in their local government, how they conceptualize their
roles as women, what perspectives they hold regarding the development and transmission
of culture, and the ways in which they value youth. By focusing on the positive
effect women leaders can have on the identity and health of youth, this research
broadens our understanding of the relationship between First Nations cultural
identity and youth suicide rates and provides support for the involvement of
First Nations women in local government.
Metaphors of cancer: Cross-cultural
differences in Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal children
Ulrich Teucher
(University of Saskatchewan)
The
use of literary tropes such as metaphors can provide reference
frames for the study of children’s narratives
and source models for research in developmental psychology. In cancer narratives,
metaphors constitute complex cognitive models through which patients undertake
to organize, represent, and (re)constitute complex body, self, illness, life,
and death. But, for many developmental reasons, it is much harder for children
with cancer to give voice to their experience and little is known how children
from various cultural backgrounds differently adjust to such crises. The study
being reported here employs an empirically generated “Therapeutic
Psychopoetics” that can make the therapeutic, psychological, and aesthetic
properties of those metaphors explicit that young cancer patients employ in
their narratives. A Study Group of 25 Cree children and a Control Group of
25 Caucasian children were invited to provide metaphors and oral narratives
of their lives with cancer. The results reveal interesting similarities and
cultural differences in the use of metaphors and the composition and content
of oral accounts of cancer, showing how Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal children
think about life with cancer, its treatment, and healing.
Affect, values and respect:
The need for cross-cultural research
Yeh Hsueh (University
of Memphis)
Katherine M Kitzmann (University of Memphis)
In
1932 Piaget offered a conceptual distinction between children’s unilateral
and mutual respect, and he later further elaborated the properties of respect.
However, little developmental research has addressed this topic since then. Piaget’s
definition of respect in terms of social exchange touches on the concept of affects
(i.e., children’s respect originates from fear of and affection for parents)
and relies on the concept of values (i.e., respect is essentially an attribution
of value to another person). But in other ways affects and values were not well
integrated in Piaget’s theory of knowledge development. Pointing out this
disconnection, Terry Brown revised Piaget’s social exchange model to incorporate
affective development. Similarly, because norms for affects and values are both
culturally mediated, we believe that research on respect from a Piagetian perspective
would benefit from the incorporation of concepts from cultural psychology and
cognitive anthropology. Such integration would not likely entail any significant
change in current research method. Rather, this integration would serve a heuristic
purpose in promoting more cross-cultural research on children’s respect,
and would provide a meaningful conceptual framework for interpreting results
of new research in this area.
Fairness and selfishness in
negotiations about sharing: A developmental and cross-cultural
perspective
Monika Keller (Max Planck Institute
for Human Development)
Michaela Gummerum (University of British Columbia)
Jutta Mata (Max Planck Institute for Human Development)
Zhou Liqi (Chinese Academy of Sciences)
We will present findings from
a study integrating moral development and behavioral economics
in a group decision-making experiment. Children of four different
age groups decided individually and negotiated in a group of three
how to share a sum of money with an anonymous other group (dictator-game).
Negotiations were videotaped and analyzed. Individual decisions
revealed that an equal split was the modal choice. The youngest group was slightly
more egoistic than the older groups. In general, groups gave slightly less
than individuals. Fairness was used most frequently as reason for
equal split across all age groups. Fairness arguments and attributions
of positive characteristics to the other (anonymous) group supported
the increase the offers, while arguments characterizing the other
group as negative served to decrease the offer. Attributions to
others were used more frequently by older children and adolescents
compared to the youngest group. Analysis of the process of argumentation
will be presented. We will also discuss findings from a cross-cultural
comparison with groups of Chinese children and adolescents of the
same ages. First results show a predominance of economic arguments
compared to the more private arguments of the German sample.
9:00-10:30 Loch II
SY05 Symposium Session 5
Theoretical dialogue about the
development of young children in a child care center
Organizer: Vera Vasconcellos
(State University of Rio de Janeiro)
Discussant: Cintia Rodriguez (University of Portsmouth)
The
main aim of this symposium is to develop a dialog among different
theoretical perspectives concerning human development. The basis
for this discussion is through common empirical data, observations
in form of video recordings, of a University Child Care Center
from a public University in Niteroi, Brazil. These observations
were done weekly, focusing on the first two months (May and June)
of the children (20 to 24 months of age) in this new educational
environment. The observations focused the children’s
interactions with the environment, other children, family and staff. The original
study, developed by Vasconcellos, through Henry Wallon’s sociogenetic approach,
analyses the role of imitation in the developing concept of self, of others and
of things. Colinvaux takes another perspective when analyzing these observations,
that looks into cognitive processes. Focussing on children’s actions when
playing with toys and with other children, she shows how repetition of actions
generates a broadening spectrum of actions as well as new ones, thereby allowing
the young child to build knowledge. Dibar et al, on the other hand, explore the
possibility of finding evidence in children’s
actions that may contribute to the current discussion of domain specificity.
In this view, they will focus the neuroconstructivist perspective of development
(Karmiloff-Smith) on the origins of cognition. They will discuss, particularly,
the theme of the gravitational field in which we are born and that has an evolutionary
impact even on the formation of our organism. In the video recording, they take
into account the children’s games on the slide, on the trail and with
small toys. Together these three perspectives have the objective of discussing
the mediational nature of social, historical and cultural contexts on one side
and constraints on the other, in the processes of development of small children.
This discussion tries to link contributions of developmental psychology and
articulate it to the needs of child education. The challenge here is to elaborate
a proposal that will meet the needs of these small children with effective
participation from all: researchers, teachers and parents, to ensure quality
in child education, that promotes healthy development for children.
Play and imitation in a peer
interaction
Vera Vasconcellos (State University
of Rio de Janeiro)
Aline Barbosa de Sa (Lehigh University)
Play, actions and knowledge
building processes
Dominique Colinvaux (Universidade
Federal Fluminense)
Contributions from a
neurocognitive approach
Celia Dibar (Universidad de
Buenos Aires)
Maria Teresa Cafferata (Universidad de Buenos Aires)
10:45-12:00 Ches II PL03 Plenary Session 3 – Carol
Lee
Every
shut eye ain’t
sleep: Modeling the “scientific” from
the everyday as cultural processes
Carol Lee (Northwestern University)
The arts provide a unique mediating
role in human development, offering a medium and context through
which both cognitive and socio-emotional development can be cultivated.
In everyday contexts, music, film, dance and the visual arts play
such roles; often embodying cultural scripts, models of human action,
and arenas of disputation within and across cultural communities.
Involvement with these art forms is situated in social spaces in
which language, artifacts, and interactions with other people that provide
the resources through which learning and engagement are negotiated.
While we have lots of evidence that everyday settings outside of
school are organized in ways that support deep engagement in such
learning through the arts, schools have been successful typically
only in specialized arts programming that is not considered a major
stream of academic work.
And
in schools serving youth from low-income and minority communities, such programming
often receives only minimal support. However, how everyday knowledge in the
arts can be leveraged to support specific academic forms of disciplinary
learning, particularly in fields such as literary reasoning, mathematics
and science, has not been sufficiently researched, especially with
regard to youth from ethnic minority and low-income communities.
In this presentation, I examine
how everyday knowledge in the arts offer conceptual anchors for
modeling particular concepts and inscriptions in science, mathematics
and literary reasoning. I will illustrate the functions that such
anchors serve in real cases of instruction organized around building
upon cultural repertoires of youth from ethnic minority and low-income
communities. In particular, I am concerned with understanding how a particular
area of the creative arts, specifically the comprehension of fictional narratives,
can bridge from the everyday to the academic, where the academic is operationalized
as reading canonical literature. The canonical literature is here defined as
literature which speaks deeply to the human condition and has stood the test
of time, crossing national borders. Specifically, I will illustrate how tacit
knowledge of African-American English rhetorical forms as well as of youth
and popular cultural forms were transformed to disciplinary specific
modes of reasoning. This transformation represents what Geoffrey
Saxe calls a form-function shift in the uses of cultural forms
from one context and function to another.
I argue that such modeling from
the everyday to the disciplinary can support multiple outcomes
in both the cognitive as well as the psycho-social dimensions of
learning: conceptual understanding, disciplinary dispositions and
habits of mind, identification with the practices of the discipline,
resilience and persistence in the face of difficulty and failure, and goal
setting. I argue that literary reasoning can also provide an arena
in which youth can learn ways of coping with life circumstances
and that such learning is necessary for all youth, but particularly
for those struggling with the challenges of poverty and societal
stigmatization through racism.
The Cultural Modeling Framework
provides conceptual and methodological tools for leveraging knowledge
constructed in everyday practices in service of learning within
academic disciplines. The Cultural Modeling Framework is offered
as both a conceptual and methodological tool for the design of learning environments
in which these dual goals of cognitive and psycho-social development are addressed
in ways that privilege the repertoires that youth develop in their everyday
lives in ways that build on and expand such repertoires for academic
learning within disciplines. This framework examines learning as
cultural processes in which knowledge, beliefs, and practices are
negotiated.
Friday,
June 2, P.M. |
  |
12:00-12:30 Ches II MEM Annual
Members Meeting
Annual Members Meeting
All
JPS members are encouraged to attend.
1:30-2:45 Ches II SY11 Symposium
Session 11
Possibility and its play
in critical exploration
Organizers:
William Shorr (Harvard Graduate School of Education)
Kate Gill (Harvard Graduate School of Education)
Discussant: Eleanor R. Duckworth (Harvard Graduate School of Education)
This
symposium investigates Piaget’s notion of possibility and
its location in three different Critical Explorations. Critical
Explorations are active investigations into phenomena fueled by
conversations. The method was developed by Eleanor Duckworth based
on her work with Inhelder and Piaget and draws heavily on Piaget’s
original Clinical Method (Duckworth, 2005).
Critical
Exploration contrasts with most teaching methodologies, first
in the choices of materials that learners encounter and second,
in the teachers’ stance
of eliciting learners’ thoughts and interest rather than telling learners
what and how to think. Together, these practices support teachers’ research
on the evolving ideas, interests and commitments of their students, allowing
them to support, in turn, the learners’ active development. Over the past
three decades, research based on Critical Explorations has informed teaching
and learning in richly diverse subject matter, from courses at the Harvard Graduate
School of Education to classrooms and informal educational settings all over
the world.
In
these three papers, adult English Language Learners consider
a painting by Cézanne
in the gallery of an art museum, secondary students interpret Erich
Remarque’s All Quiet on the Western Front, and social
studies educators begin designing a game for teaching peace as
subject matter. Each of the papers traces one or more episodes
of collaborative knowledge construction within these contexts,
looking closely at how learners engage with each other and how
this particular sort of pedagogical experience supports the expansion
of the students’ sense
of the possible.
Two
of the papers describe different, yet characteristic features
that arise in the unfolding discourse of Critical Explorations.
The first investigation, by Gill, explores Critical Exploration
through a Bakhtinian lens, analyzing how the utterances of adult
English Language Learners function to produce authentic as contrasted
with scripted dialogues. The second, by Mayer, focuses on the
ways in which authority is represented and distributed between
a teacher and her students in a literature classroom. In the
final paper, Shorr explores the development of teachers’ intellectual
and dispositional structures in a professional development workshop
context.
As
a group, these papers illustrate the contours of Critical Exploration
as a research and teaching methodology. Individually, they analyze
Critical Explorations at the level of the utterance, move, and
narrative. Each, in its own way, tells what Duckworth has termed “a story about the
collective creation of knowledge” (2001,
p.1).
Here all is possible: Critical
exploration with adult English language learners in an art museum
Kate
Gill (Harvard Graduate School of Education)
Critical exploration
and the distribution of au |